i
because I understand the advantages to Britis. interests
that those Postal Agencies confer. At the same time the
time has now arrived when it is absolitely unreasonable
to ask the Hongkong taxpayers to pay a single cash towards
their paintenance."
29387
7.
It is argued in Sir G. Murray's
letter of September 2nd., 1909,
(a). that "Hongkong herself has a not inconsider-
-able interest in the maintenance of these Agencies". That
these interests were not considered to be of great
magnitude by the spokesman of the Unofficial Members of
Council, who is also Clairman of the Chamber of Commerce,
may be inferred from his remarks that Hongkong should not
be called upon to pay a "single cash" towards their main-
-tenenco:
(b). that Hongkong has in the past profited by
them. I am unable to admit the justice of this argument.
Naturally the Colony did not undertake to increase its
Postal Staff and its buildings &c., and incur extra work
and responsibility without some profit to its Revenue. The
arrangement was one of mutual benefit and profit. The
losses on continuing them now which are given in my
paragraph 3 above are exclusive of office room and staff
&c.
209
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.